Deception
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see Deception (disambiguation).
For a parallel in popular media, see Media manipulation#Distraction by phenomenon.
Mergefrom.svg
It has been suggested that Deception (in psychological research) be merged into this article or section. (Discuss)
Mystification redirects here. For the use in sociology, see Mystification (sociology).
Contents
[hide]
* 1 Dissimulation
o 1.1 Camouflage
o 1.2 Disguise appearance
o 1.3 Dazzle
* 2 Simulation
o 2.1 Mimicry
o 2.2 Fabricate
o 2.3 Distractions
* 3 Deception in psychological experimentation
o 3.1 APA Guidelines for use of Deception in Psychological Research
+ 3.1.1 8.07 Deception in Research
+ 3.1.2 8.08 Debriefing
o 3.2 When is the use of Deception Justified in Psychological Experimentation
o 3.3 Pros of using Deception in Psychological Experimentation
o 3.4 Cons of using Deception in Psychological Experimentation
o 3.5 Examples of Deception in Psychological Experimentation
* 4 See also
* 5 References
* 6 Further reading
Deception (also called beguilement, deceit, bluff, or subterfuge) is the act of convincing another to believe information that is not true, or not the whole truth as in certain types of half-truths.
Deception involves concepts like propaganda, distraction and/or concealment. Fiction, while sometimes manipulative, is not a deception unless it is portrayed as partially truthful or as the whole truth.
In many cases it is difficult to distinguish deception from providing unintentionally wrong information. One of the reasons for this is that a person or an entire organization may be self-deceived.
[edit] Dissimulation
Dissimulation consists of concealing the truth, or in the case of half-truths, concealing parts of the truth, like inconvenient or secret information. There are three dissimulation techniques: camouflage (blend into the background), disguise appearance (altering the model) and dazzle (obfuscate the model).
[edit] Camouflage
See also: theory of camouflage
This wallaby has adaptive colouration which allows it to blend with its environment
The camouflage of a physical object often works by breaking up the visual boundary of that object. This usually involves colouring the camouflaged object with the same colours as the background against which the object will be hidden. In the realm of deceptive half-truths camouflage is realized by ‘hiding’ some of the truths.
Example:
* Camouflage as a form of visual deception is an essential part of military deception.
[edit] Disguise appearance
A disguise is an appearance to create the impression of being somebody or something else; for a well-known person this is also called incognito.
Example:
* The fictional Sherlock Holmes often disguised himself as somebody else to avoid being recognized.
In a more abstract sense, ‘disguise’ may refer to the act of disguising the nature of a particular proposal in order to hide an unpopular motivation or effect associated with that proposal. This is a form of political spin or propaganda. See also: rationalisation and transfer within the techniques of propaganda generation.
Example:
* Depicting an act of war as a “peace” mission.
[edit] Dazzle
Examples:
* The defensive mechanisms of most octopuses to eject black ink in a large cloud to aid in escape from predators.
[edit] Simulation
Simulation consists of exhibiting false information. There are three simulation techniques: mimicry (copying another model), fabrication (making up a new model), and distraction (offering an alternative model)
[edit] Mimicry
In the biological world, mimicry involves unconscious deception by similarity to another organism, or to a natural object. Animals for example may deceive predators or prey by visual, auditory or other means.
[edit] Fabricate
To make something that in reality is not what it appears to be. For example, in World War II, it was common for the Allies to use hollow tanks made out of cardboard to fool German reconnaissance planes into thinking a large armor unit was on the move in one area while the real tanks were well hidden and on the move in a location far from the fabricated “dummy” tanks.
[edit] Distractions
To get someone’s attention from the truth by offering bait or something else more tempting to divert attention away from the object being concealed. For example, a security company publicly announces that it will ship a large gold shipment down one route, while in reality take a different route.
[edit] Deception in psychological experimentation
The use of deception in psychological experimentation is a methodological procedure where the researchers purposely mislead or misinform the participants about the true nature of the experiment. The process of concealing information from the participants is omission and the purposely misleading of the participants about what is being studied is commission. The use of deception is reserved only for when it is absolutely necessary to preserve the naturalness of the participants’ behavior and the researcher must follow specific guidelines set forth by the American Psychological Association (APA).
[edit] APA Guidelines for use of Deception in Psychological Research
[edit] 8.07 Deception in Research
(a) Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study’s significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value and that effective nondeceptive alternative procedures are not feasible.
(b) Psychologists do not deceive prospective participants about research that is reasonably expected to cause physical pain or severe emotional distress.
(c) Psychologists explain any deception that is an integral feature of the design and conduct of an experiment to participants as early as is feasible, preferably at the conclusion of their participation, but no later than at the conclusion of the data collection, and permit participants to withdraw their data.
[edit] 8.08 Debriefing
(a) Psychologists provide a prompt opportunity for participants to obtain appropriate information about the nature, results, and conclusions of the research, and they take reasonable steps to correct any misconceptions that participants may have of which the psychologists are aware.
(b) If scientific or humane values justify delaying or withholding this information, psychologists take reasonable measures to reduce the risk of harm.
(c) When psychologists become aware that research procedures have harmed a participant, they take reasonable steps to minimize the harm.(Association, 2003)
[edit] When is the use of Deception Justified in Psychological Experimentation
1. When it is necessary to investigate important research questions involving the observation of true human behavior, which could not be examined through other means
2. When the use of deception would not cause more risk to the participant than everyday life events.
3. When the researcher thoroughly debriefs the participants immediately at the conclusion of the experiment, and explains what was studied.
4. All APA Guidelines and Code of Ethics are followed.
5. Research is approved by proper authorities (IRB’s, etc.).
[edit] Pros of using Deception in Psychological Experimentation
1. Deception increases the impact of the experimental environment; making the experimental situation more realistic in turn increasing internal validity of a study.
2. Deception allows for studying human life that a researcher would not necessarily be able to study ethically.
3. With deception a researcher is able to protect against problems with participants. For example, a participant’s motives can affect how he/she responds in an experimental situation.
[edit] Cons of using Deception in Psychological Experimentation
1. Deception can be ethically irresponsible.
2. Participants cooperate accordingly only in an environment of clarity, openness, and trust. They can get defensive when they feel they are being misled by the experimenter.
3. Some participants might develop emotional or mental issues because they feel they were lied to.
4. Since deception experiments generally take place in a laboratory, the external validity can be low.
[edit] Examples of Deception in Psychological Experimentation
“Danger: Severe Shock”
An experiment conducted by Research Stanley Milgram in 1963 used deception.
The deception in this experiment includes the researcher telling the participant that he will be participating in an experiment involving the effects of punishment upon learning. But actually the study looks at the participant’s willingness to obey hurtful commands. Ultimately the participant was to administer increasing amounts of electric shock to a confederate when the confederate answered a question incorrectly posed by the researcher. The confederate begins to react to the electric shock, screaming and yelling in agony, but the participant in the experiment is urged to continue with the electric shock despite his reluctance. 64% of participants shocked the learner (confederate) with the highest voltage.
[edit] See also
* Academic dishonesty
* Betrayal
* Communications deception
* Confidence trick
* Doctrine of mental reservation
* Electronic deception
* Forgery
* Fraud
* Good cop/bad cop
* Half-truth
* Hoax
* Lie
* Limited hangout
* List of topics related to public relations and propaganda
* Media manipulation
* Media transparency
* Military deception
* Misdirection
* Modified limited hangout
* Newspeak
* Phishing
* Placebo (origins of technical term)
* Plagiarism
* Propaganda
* Psychological warfare
* Secrecy
* Selectivity
* Simulated reality
* Social engineering
* Spectacle
* Spin (public relations)
* Steganography
* Sting operation
* Swampland in Florida
* Theft Act 1968
* Theft Act 1978
[edit] References
* Association, A. P. (2003). ethics: Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved February 18, 2008, from APA Online
* Bassett, Rodney L.. & Basinger, David, & Livermore, Paul. (1992, December). Lying in the Laboratory: Deception in Human Research from a Psychological, Philosophical, and Theological Perspectives. [1]
* Cohen, Fred. (2006). Frauds, Spies, and Lies and How to Defeat Them. ASP Peess. ISBN 1-878109-36-7.
* Behrens, Roy R. (2002). False colors: Art, Design and Modern Camouflage. Bobolink Books. ISBN 0-9713244-0-9.
* Behrens, Roy R. (2009). Camoupedia: A Compendium of Research on Art, Architecture and Camouflage. Bobolink Books. ISBN 978-0-9713244-6-6.
* Bennett, W Lance; Entman, Robert M The Politics of Misinformation
* Blechman, Hardy and Newman, Alex (2004). DPM: Disruptive Pattern Material. DPM Ltd. ISBN 0-9543404-0-X.
* Edelman, Murray Constructing the political spectacle 1988
* Latimer, Jon. (2001). Deception in War. John Murray. ISBN 978-0719556050.
* Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2006). Research Methods in Psychology Seventh Edition. Boston: McGraw Hill.
* Bruce Schneier, Secrets and Lies
* Robert Wright The Moral Animal: Why We Are the Way We Are: The New Science of Evolutionary Psychology. Vintage, 1995. ISBN 0-679-76399-6
1 comments:
I look forward to reading your blog postings with great interest.
Post a Comment
// <![CDATA[
if (!window.google || !google.friendconnect) {
document.write('' +
'');
}
// ]]> // //
Links to this post
Create a Link